ECOLOGY WITHOUT NATURE: Timothy or Hugh?

Monday, February 11, 2013

Timothy or Hugh?

Richard Graham made this. The question is, is there a significant difference between me and Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall, the chef?

1 comment:

Paul Reid-Bowen said...: I have noted the close resemblance for some time. Perhaps you are simply local manifestations or instantiations of some weird hyperobject.; February 11, 2013 at 7:08 AM

Post a Comment

“Outstanding.”
—Slavoj Zizek, In Defense of Lost Causes

“Dark ecology has the potential to be the punk rock or experimental pop of ecological thinking.”
—Kasino A4

“It isn’t [nature] itself that needs trashing — we’re doing a fine job of that already; it’s our way of thinking about it that needs to be structurally realigned ... it's an important book that, in a scant 205 pages of main text ... frames a debate that no doubt will be carried on for years to come.”
—Vince Carducci, Pop Matters

“He practices what he theorizes: nothing is wasted in his argumentation.”
—Emmanouil Aretoulakis, Synthesis

“Picking up where his most obvious predecessors, Gregory Bateson and Felix Guattari, left off, Morton understands mental ecology as the ground zero of ecological thinking, as that which must be redressed before anything else and above all. Morton goes beyond both his forebears, however, in repairing the rift between science and the humanities, which the Enlightenment opened up and against which Romanticism reacted. Perhaps most pleasantly surprising, given its erudition, is that in its stylistic elegance The Ecological Thought is as satisfying to read as it is necessary to ponder.”
—Vince Carducci

ECOLOGY WITHOUT NATURE

Pages

Monday, February 11, 2013

Timothy or Hugh?

1 comment:

Counter

ShareThis

Links without Nature

Artifacts without Nature